🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes added later and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which election day went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president previously backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think it’s definitive, but I think probable, and I wish he does so afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed some opposition. However overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.